Previous Page
Back to Project Gallery
Antiquity Vol 79 No 303 March 2005 Article number 79006
The Story |
Figure 1. Two types of scripts, rending, probably, the same text, the second one 'translating' the first one. Click to enlarge. |
![]() Figure 2. Dacian victorious soldiers and roman prisoners are received by priests at the gate of the Sarmizegetusa fortress. Click to enlarge. |
Nowadays, there are only 35 pieces left, together with some photos taken of other pieces in the time of the Second World War (Romalo 2003). However, the oral tradition testifies that the lead plates represent copies, made in 1875 by order of King Carol I, of some gold originals. The copying of the hundreds of pieces was accomplished at the nails factory in Sinaia, and the copies were stored first at the Sinaia Monastery and afterwards were transported to Bucharest. Nobody knows what happened to the gold originals. The detailed analyses of the samples extracted from all the 35 surviving artefacts, performed at the Institute of Nuclear Physics in Bucharest, stated that the composition of the plates is typical for the printing lead from the second half of the nineteenth century. |
|
Description |
![]() Figure 3. Alliance between Dacians and Scythians. Click to enlarge. |
![]() Figure 4. Royal genealogy. Click to enlarge. |
Besides the texts, on the plates there are many illustrations. The representations are extremely complex and cover a great part of the realia domain: armies, fortresses, portraits of kings (even detailed royal genealogies), totemic animals, gods, temples, religious symbols, war machines, trophies, various buildings, vegetation etc. The representation of the plan of Sarmizegetusa stronghold is striking at a time when the first systematic excavations had not started yet. Equally amazing is the detailed representation of the Burebista's two-storied limestone temple, discovered only in 1956 (Crisan 1986: 176-180). |
|
The language of the texts has somehow an Indo-European appearance, but it is not like the expected Dacian language: that language seems to have nothing in common with the known remains of the Romanian substratum. There are some Indo-European words, but no final consonants, no desinences or inflection, and subsequently no grammatical marks for gender, number, case or person. Almost all the nouns end in -o, including the feminine ones ending in -a in the Greek and Latin sources: Boerobiseto, Dacibalo; Napoko, Sarmigetuzo. The groups of consonants are infrequent, proving the predisposition to open syllables. There are some words borrowed from Greek, especially in the field of military terminology (basileo, chiliarcho) and some from Latin. The most important words do not have cognates in other Indo-European languages: mato 'king', kotopolo 'priest', talipiko 'fortress'. |
![]() Figure 5. The plan of the Sarmizegetusa fortress. The west-gate is the main entrance. On the other side of the east-gate is the complex of sanctuaries. Click to enlarge. |
![]() Figure 6. The two-storied temple in Sarmizegetusa is represented in the upper right corner. The ruins of the four rows of columns, the stairs turning to right at the west side, the wall and the tower at east side, the gallery and the platform of the second floor were discovered only in the second half of the twentieth century. Click to enlarge. |
Conclusion |
|
References
|
|
|
Aurora Petan: Institute of Linguistics, Bucharest, Romania. (Email: apetan@gmail.com) Back to Top |
|