Previous Page
Back to Project Gallery

Antiquity Vol 78 No 300 June 2004

Prehistoric Sitio Drago, Bocas del Toro, Panama

Thomas A. Wake, Jason de Leon & Carlos Fitzgerald Bernal

A recently discovered large (15 ha) pre-Columbian archaeological site in north-western Panamá shows great potential for understanding the past social organisation and cultural history in an area that appears to be of far greater significance than formerly thought (Haberland 1984; Linares 1977, 1980). Sitio Drago is located on the north shore of Isla Colon in Bocas del Toro province, Panamá (Figs 1, 2, and 3). The site consists of a minimum of 15 low earthen mounds scattered over 500 m of well-developed midden on a stabilized beach ridge sandwiched between dense tropical forest and a fringing coral reef. The first Europeans to pass through Boca del Drago included Cristobál Colón and his son Hernán on Columbus' fourth voyage to the New World in 1502. Evidence recovered during 2002 surface collections and 2003 test excavations suggests strong links with the Pacific coastal regions of western Panama and Costa Rica (Chiriquí & Diquís), and south-east Costa Rica. Eight radiometric age determinations place occupation of the site to AD 900-1150 (Table 1).

Figure 1 (Click to enlarge)

Figure 1: The Bocas del Toro Archipelago, Western Caribbean Panamá.
Figure 2 (Click to view)

Figure 2: Sitio Drago, Bocas del Toro, Panamá; numbered ovals represent mounds
Click to enlarge

Bocas del Toro has been considered a "backwater" with a low level of socio-political organisation (Linares 1977:311, 1980:67; Stirling & Stirling 1962). However, this assumption has a weak empirical basis. Haberland (1984:253) suggests "more investigations [in Bocas del Toro] have to be conducted before we can completely understand this area and link it with others." The primary goals of the Proyecto Arqueológico Sitio Drago (PASD) are to examine several different areas of the site in order to determine its occupational history and internal structure, and the external connections, subsistence economy, and socio-political organisation of the site's past occupants.

The Pacific Chiriquí (Panamá) and Diquís (Costa Rica) regions constitute the Greater Chiriquí interaction sphere as currently defined (Haberland 1976, 1984). It is possible, but remains unproven, that the Bocas del Toro Archipelago, including Sitio Drago and Cerro Brujo (Linares & Ranere 1980), together with Pacific Chiriqui and Diquís may constitute a greater Chiriqui interaction sphere (see Haberland 1984). The 2002 surface collections and 2003 test excavations at Drago illustrate the presence of prestige goods, as well as a wider variety of general artefact types, and a greater diversity of ceramics than seen at Cerro Brujo (Kudarauskas et al. 1980; Linares 1980). Sitio Drago is much larger and appears more internally complex than the loosely organised farming hamlets such as Cerro Brujo, suggesting a large population and significant inter-regional contact.

Figure 3

Figure 3: The beach at Boca del Drago.
Figure 4

Figure 4: Feline Effigy Metate Fragments from Sitio Drago (eye diameter approximately 2.5 cm).

Artefacts recovered from Sitio Drago include carved stone effigy metate (Figures 4a and b) and sculpture fragments, basalt prismatic and tanged blades, stone celts of various sizes, shell and clay beads, ceramic appliqué figurines of humans (Figure 5), marine invertebrates (Figure 6), and possibly felines (Figure 7), and various ceramic sherds (Figures 8 and 9). Preservation at the site is excellent, as indicated by the recovery of over 6000 diagnostic bone specimens, large numbers of mollusc remains, and a great deal of carbonised plant material.

Goods imported from Pacific Chiriquí suggest Sitio Drago may lie within a broader "Greater Chiriqui" interaction sphere. The presence of ceramic wares (Figure 8) potentially imported from Pacific Chiriquí (Linarte Zoned Red Line, Linares 1968a, 1968b) and several as yet undescribed ceramic wares (Figure 9) with affinity to other Greater Chiriquian types supports the idea of trans-ithsmian connections (Linares 1977, 1980; Lothrop 1963; MacCurdy 1911). The broken jaguar effigy metates and sculpture fragments suggest the presence of prestige goods and social ranking (Graham 1992:176; Snarskis 1984:210).

This project also seeks to determine whether the subsistence system proposed for Cerro Brujo operated at Drago. Linares (1976, 1977) proposed a local agricultural system focusing on swidden root and tree cropping supported by "garden hunting" and fishing. The presence at Sitio Drago of basin millingstones, carbonised remains of tree crops, a diverse array of terrestrial forest reptiles and mammals and a variety of reef, mangrove, and offshore fish generally supports Linares' (1976, 1980) contention. However, the presence of flat milling stones may suggest a more mixed seed/root/tree cropping focus. We plan to return to Sitio Drago in the summer of 2004 under the auspices of the Institute for Tropical Ecology and Conservation (ITEC: www.itec-edu.org) to excavate more test pits. We plan to use 3mm screens and an intensive soil sampling and flotation recovery protocol.

Figure 5

Figure 5: Modelled human applique figurine, Sitio Drago, Mound 6, Unit 1.
Figure 6

Figure 6: Modelled crab applique figurine handle, Sitio Drago, Mound 6, Unit 1.

Sitio Drago stands out as a completely different type of site than any other studied in the region. The site appears particularly well suited for the examination of the development of social organisation in a tropical forest environment. Investigation at Drago is supported by the local community and by the Panamanian archaeological establishment. Once more work has been done at Drago and its constituents analysed, comparisons can be made to other sites in Greater Chiriquí, Panamá and Costa Rica, and chiefdoms throughout the Americas. This project will ultimately address the level of socio-political organisation at the site, daily activity at Drago and its place within a regional settlement system. Sitio Drago stands to provide a great deal of new information concerning lower Central American interaction spheres, trans-isthmian exchange, and development of chiefdom level societies in the "intermediate area."

Acknowledgements
The following persons facilitated and/or participated in the 2003 field work at Sitio Drago: Don Aristides "Bolo" Serracin, Ana Serracin de Shaffer, Willy and Juany Serracin, Boca del Drago, Panamá; Peter Lahanas, Director, ITEC, Panamá; Christina Campbell, Pomona College; Jeannette Bond, Doug Doughty, Angela Harrington, Michael Kay and Elizabeth Kempton; David and Marvalee Wake, and the Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA. We thank Matthew Bandy for his constructive comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Figure 7

Figure 7: Modelled feline applique figurine, Sitio Drago, Mound 6, Unit 1.
Figure 8

Figure 8: Probable Linarte Zoned Red Line sherds, Sitio Drago, Mound 6, Unit 1.
Figure 9

Figure 9: Undescribed pre-firing zoned incised sherds, Sitio Drago, Mound 6, Unit 1.
Sample NumberRYBPCalibrated Age1StratumMaterial
Beta-1826511050 +/- 60AD 874 - 1071IIA Carbonised Raphia nut
Beta-1826521020 +/- 60AD 894 - 1160IIACarbonised Raphia nut
Beta-182653950 +/- 40AD 1017 - 1164IIICarbonised Wood
Beta-1826541040 +/- 70AD 860 - 1163IIBCarbonised Wood
Beta-1826551070 +/- 70AD 779 - 1058IIBCarbonised Wood
Beta-182657990 +/- 90 AD 886 - 1251IIICarbonised Wood
Beta-182658720 +/- 80AD 1159 - 1411 IIICarbonised Wood
Beta-182658950 +/- 40AD 1017 - 1188III Carbonised Wood

Table 1: Radiocarbon dates from Sitio Drago, Mound 6
1Greatest relative area under 2 sigma probability distribution (Stuiver et al. 1998)

References

  • DROLET, R. P. 1992. The House and the Territory: The Organisational Structure of Chiefdom Art in the Diquis Subregion of Greater Chiriqui, in F.W. Lange (ed.), Wealth and Hierarchy in the Intermediate Area: pp. 207-241 Washington D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.
  • GRAHAM, M. M. 1992. Art-Tools and the Language of Power in the Early Art of the Atlantic Watershed of Costa Rica, in Frederick W. Lange (ed.), Wealth and Hierarchy in the Intermediate Area: pp.165-206 Washington D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.
  • GORDON, B. L. 1962. Notes on Shell Mounds Near the Caribbean Coast of Western Panama. Panama Archaeologist 5.
  • HABERLAND, W. 1976. Gran Chiriqui. Vinculos 2:115-121.
  • – 1984. The Archaeology of Greater Chiriqui, in Frederick W. Lange and Doris Z. Stone (eds.), The Archaeology of Lower Central America: pp.233-253 School of American Research. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
  • KUDARAUSKAS, M O., O. F. LINARES & I. BORGOGNO 1980. Ceramic Classes from the Bocas del Toro Sites (CA-3 and CA-2), in Olga F. Linares and Anthony J. Ranere (eds.), Adaptive Radiations in Prehistoric Panama. Report 12: pp. 385-393 Peabody Museum monographs, No. 5. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
  • LINARES, O.F. 1976. "Garden Hunting" in the American Tropics. Human Ecology 4(4):331-349.
  • – 1977. Adaptive Strategies in Western Panama. World Archaeology 8(3):304-319.
  • 1980. The Ceramic record: Time and Place. In Olga F. Linares and Anthony J. Ranere (eds.), Adaptive Radiations in Prehistoric Panama: pp.81-117 Peabody Museum monographs, No. 5. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  • LINARES, O.F. & A.J. RANERE (eds.) 1980. Adaptive Radiations in Prehistoric Panama. Peabody Museum Monographs, No. 5. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  • LINARES DE SAPIR, O. 1968a. Ceramic Phases for Chiriquí, Panamá, and Their Relationship to Neighboring Sequences. American Antiquity 33(2):216-225.
  • – 1968b. Cultural Chronology of the Gulf of Chiriqui, Panama. Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology, No. 8. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
  • LOTHROP, S.K. 1963. Archaeology of the Diquís Delta, Costa Rica. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Vol. 51. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
  • MACCURDY, G.G. 1911. A Study of Chiriquian Antiquities. Memoirs of the Connecticut Academy of Sciences, Vol. 3.
  • SNARSKIS, M.J. 1984. Central America: The Lower Caribbean, in F.W. Lange & Doris Z. Stone (eds.), The Archaeology of Lower Central America: pp. 195-232 School of American Research. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
  • STIRLING, M.W. & M. STIRLING 1964. Archaeological Notes on Almirante Bay, Bocas del Toro, Panama. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 191, Anthropological Papers, No.72, pp. 255-284. Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C.
  • STUIVER, M., P.J. REIMER, E. BARD, J. WARREN BECK, G. S. BURR, K.A. HUGHEN, B. KROMER, G. MCCORMAC, J. VAN DER PLICHT, & M. SPURK 1998. INTCAL98 Radiocarbon Age Calibration, 24,000-0 cal BP. Radiocarbon 40(3):1041-1083

  • Thomas A. Wake: The Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA
    Jason de Leon: Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University
    Carlos Fitzgerald Bernal: Dirección de Património Histórico, Instituto Nacionál de Cultura, Republica de Panamá

    Back to Top

    Previous Page


    Home | Online Archive | Project Gallery | FAQs
    Letters to the Editor | Events and Announcements | Reviews | TAG