Terms & Conditions

New radiocarbon dates from Chitral, NWFP, Pakistan, and their implications for the Gandharan Grave Culture of northern Pakistan

Ihsan Ali, Derek Hamilton, Paul Newson, Muhammad Qasim, Ruth Young & Muhammad Zahir

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of Gankoreneotek and Sangoor in the Chitral Valley.
Click to enlarge.
Introduction

Chitral, one of the most isolated areas of Pakistan, is located in the north-west of the North West Frontier Province (Figures 1 and 2). Until 1999 archaeological work in Chitral had been limited to a report by Stacul (1969) on ancient cemeteries, and the study by Allchin (1970) of pottery, both thought to have strong affinities with the Gandharan Grave Culture (GGC). Work from 1999 onwards has located many more graves in Chitral that have been linked to the GGC, but only in 2007 were samples of human bone from graves submitted for radiocarbon dating.

Gandharan Grave Culture

The GGC is an archaeological phenomenon known from work in the second half of the twentieth century by Dani (1963) and Stacul (1987). The GGC is known primarily through excavations of graves in the valleys of Swat and Dir located south of Chitral and this area traditionally forms the geographical core of the culture, although sites have been identified in the Vale of Peshawar (Khan 1973) and the Taxila Valley (Dani 1986). The dating scheme established by Dani and Stacul places the GGC between c.1500 and c. 500 BC. This rural culture is critical to understanding the period between the two major urban developments of South Asia, the Indus and the Early Historic, and establishing a scientific chronology is fundamental to this understanding.


Figure 2
Figure 2. Map of NWFP showing selected Gandharan Grave sites.
Click to view full-size file (.pdf)
Recent work

In 1999 a Pakistani-Bradford team carried out survey in Chitral, recording 15 cist graves which were identified as GGC sites (Ali et al. 2002; Figure 3). Pakistani teams carried out further survey and excavation in Chitral locating further large cemeteries and excavating a series of graves at the sites of Sangoor and Parwak (Ali et al. 2005; Ali & Zahir 2005). These excavations in 2003-4 showed that there were a number of similarities with grave construction styles from Swat and Dir, and some very similar grave goods, but required scientific dates to situate the graves chronologically in relation to the GGC.

Current work

In August 2007 excavations were planned at Parwak specifically to obtain samples for dating, but a major land slide destroyed the village of Sanoghar and road access to the site. We therefore identified the site of Gankoreneotek and excavated two graves there. Grave construction, burials in the form of cremations and grave goods of pots, beads, and an iron spear head had similarities with GGC material from Swat and Dir. Samples of human bone from the 2007 excavations at Gankoreneotek, and the 2005 excavations at Sangoor and Parwak were collected.


Figure 3
Figure 3. Map of Chitral showing location of Gankoreneotek, Sangoor and Parwak.
Click to view full-size file (.pdf).

A total of seven samples human bone were submitted in 2007 to the University of Waikato Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory, Hamilton, New Zealand. These included six samples of inhumed bone from Sangoor and Parwak and a single sample of cremated bone from a cist grave at Gankoreneotek (Figure 4).

The dates from Gankoreneotek, Sangoor and Parwak range from 1000 BC to AD 1000. They are shown on Figure 5 (.pdf), with dates from the Swat valley (further east) for comparison. The calibrations of the results, relating the radiocarbon measurements directly to calendar dates, are given in Table 1 (.pdf), and in Figure 5 (.pdf), and have been calculated using the calibration curve of Reimer et al. (2004) and the computer program OxCal (v4) (Online manual: http://c14.arch.ox.ac.uk/oxcalhelp/hlp_contents.html). The calibrated ranges in Table 1 (.pdf) have been calculated according to the maximum intercept method (Stuiver & Reimer 1986), while those in Figure 5 (.pdf), are derived from the probability method (Stuiver & Reimer 1993). All date ranges are quoted in the form recommended by Mook (1986), with the end points rounded outwards to 10 years.


Figure 4
Figure 4. Gankoreneotek cist grave for cremation burial.
Click to enlarge.
Implications of dates

These dates raise many questions about the archaeology of Chitral and our understanding of the GGC, which we will explore in our future work. We need to look afresh at the nature of sites and material culture that have been classified as GGC, and the geographical and chronological spread of sites in South and Central Asia. We also need to explore the role of Islam in Chitral and its impact on culture here, which is particularly important given the similarities between excavated graves and later Islamic graves. It is only with these new dates that we can begin to consider the form and development of the GGC outside the core area and beyond the traditionally accepted date range. These dates are the first scientific dates for any archaeological site in Chitral, and thus provide the basis for a chronology which can be expanded with future work.


Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Professor Graeme Barker, Cambridge University; Professor Robin Coningham, Durham University; Professor Timothy Insoll, Manchester University; Peter and Azra Meadows, Glasgow University; staff at the University of Leicester; staff and students at Hazara University; staff at Chitral Museum; Professor Brian Hemphill, University of California. The British Academy provided funding for both fieldwork and the dating, for which we are very grateful.

References

  • ALESSIO, M., F. BELLA, C. CORTESI & B. TURI. 1969. University of Rome carbon-14 dates VII. Radiocarbon 11(2): 482-98.
  • ALI, I., M. ZAHIR & M. QASIM. 2005. Archaeological survey of district Chitral, 2004. Frontier Archaeology 3: 91-106.
  • ALI, I. & M. ZAHIR. 2005. Excavation of Gandharan graves at Parwak, Chitral, 2003-4. Frontier Archaeology 3: 135-82.
  • ALI, I., C. BATT, R. CONINGHAM & R. YOUNG. 2002. New exploration in the Chitral Valley, Pakistan: an extension of the Gandharan Grave culture. Antiquity 76: 647-53.
  • ALLCHIN, F.R. 1970. A pottery group from Ayun, Chitral. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 23: 104.
  • DANI, A.H. 1986. The historic city of Taxila. Lahore: Sang-E-Meel Publications.
    -1967. Timargarha and the Gandharan Grave Culture. Ancient Pakistan 3: 1-407.
  • FISHMAN, B., H. FORBES & B. LAWN. 1977. University of Pennsylvania radiocarbon dates XIX. Radiocarbon 19(2): 188-228.
  • FISHMAN, B. & B. LAWN. 1978. University of Pennsylvania radiocarbon dates XX. Radiocarbon 20(2): 210-33.
  • KHAN, M.A. 1973. Excavations at Zarif Karuna. Pakistan Archaeology 9: 1-94.
  • MOOK, W.G. 1986. Business meeting: recommendations/resolutions adopted by the twelfth international radiocarbon conference. Radiocarbon 28: 799.
  • REIMER, P.J., M.G.L. BAILLIE, E. BARD, A. BAYLISS, J.W. BECK, C.J.H. BERTRAND, P.G. BLACKWELL, C.E. BUCK, G.S. BURR, K.B. CUTLER, P.E. DAMON, R.L. EDWARDS, R.G. FAIRBANKS, M. FRIEDRICH, T.P. GUILDERSON, A.G. HOGG, K.A. HUGHEN, B. KROMER, G. McCORMAC, S. MANNING, C. BRONK RAMSEY, R.W. REIMER, S. REMMELE, J.R. SOUTHON, M. STUIVER, S. TALAMO, F.W. TAYLOR, J. VAN DER PLICHT & C.E. WEYHENMEYER. 2004. IntCal04 terrestrial radiocarbon age calibration, 0-26 Cal Kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46: 1029-58.
  • STACUL, G. 1969. Discovery of Protohistoric cemeteries in the Chitral Valley (West Pakistan). East & West 19: 92-9.
    -1987. Prehistoric and Protohistoric Swat, Pakistan (c. 3000-1400 BC). Rome: IsMEO.
    STUIVER, M. & P.J. REIMER. 1986. A computer program for radiocarbon age calculation. Radiocarbon 28: 1022-30.
    -1993. Extended 14C database and revised CALIB 3.0 14C age calibration program. Radiocarbon 35: 215-30.

Authors

*Author for correspondence

  • Ihsan Ali
    Hazara University, Mansehra, NWFP, Pakistan
    (Email: ihsanali55@ymail.com)
  • Derek Hamilton
    School of Archaeology and Ancient History, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
    (Email: wdh1@leicester.ac.uk)
  • Paul Newson
    Department of History and Archaeology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
    (Email: pn04@aub.edu.lb)
  • Muhammad Qasim
    Chitral Museum, Chitral, NWFP, Pakistan
    (Email: gasimchitrali@hotmail.com)
  • Ruth Young*
    School of Archaeology and Ancient History, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
    (Email: rly3@le.ac.uk)
  • Muhammad Zahir
    School of Archaeology and Ancient History, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
    (Email: mz49@leicester.ac.uk)

Back to Top