Tin sources and settlement in the Bronze Age of south-eastern Europe: a pilot study from western Serbia

H. Arthur Bankoff, Slobodan Mitrović, Radivoje Arsić, Rebecca Boger, Vojislav Filipović, Andrea Huska & Wayne Powell

Introduction

Tin is at the centre of many questions about the European Bronze Age. It is essential in making bronze, a copper-tin alloy, which is harder and casts more readily than copper alone. Tin is a rare metal and its sources still present a conundrum for archaeologists and geologists alike (Penhallurick 1986; Rapp 1999; Skarpelis 2003; Valera & Valera 2003; Haustein et al. 2010). In the words of Anthony Harding (2000: 201), 'through much of Europe, it is unknown how the bronzesmiths who turned out such enormous quantities of bronzework... acquired their supplies'. We believe that at least some of the tin used in the Bronze Age — in the Aegean, as well as in south-eastern and central Europe (and possibly further afield) — may have come from western Serbia, integrating the area into wider trade networks.

Fieldwork in western Serbia

In this context, Brooklyn College and the Cultural Heritage Preservation Institute of Valjevo in Serbia conducted archaeological fieldwork in the vicinity of Belotić and Bela Crkva in western Serbia from 28 July to 18 August 2010. Our objectives for this pilot season were twofold: to locate Bronze Age settlements; and to determine whether tin ore (cassiterite) is present in the streams of western Serbia, indicating deposits in the parent rocks.

Prior to our discovery of the settlement of Spasovine during an initial survey in 2008, there was virtually no published information on Bronze Age settlements in western Serbia (see Zotović 1985). This region roughly encompasses the area of the rivers Drina, Jadar, Kolubara and upper West Morava, and it is rich in metallic ores. The proximity to vital ore sources gives our discovery a special weight. The pilot season of the joint Serbian-American Jadar project found several more Bronze Age settlements and tumuli and documented the presence of tin in the gravels of two tributary streams of the river Jadar.

Locating Bronze Age settlements
Figure 1
Figure 1. Location of fieldwork in western Serbia. Sites: 1 Spasovine; 2 Mali Gradac; 3 Likodra; 4 Kruglic; 5 Crkvine.
Click to enlarge.

Survey conducted in the three-week summer season of 2010 increased the number of known settlements to five (Figure 1). Of these, Spasovine, a flat settlement, was tested with small exploratory excavations, and Likodra, a hilltop site, was surveyed. These and at least three others, Mali Gradac, Kruglić and Crkvine, form the first corpus of Bronze Age settlements known from the Jadar region. The locations of all of the sites indicate a possible connection with tin sources. Durman (1997) and McGeehan-Liritzis & Taylor (1987) have written on the possible importance of west Serbian tin, but little archaeological work has been done here since the early 1980s.

Locating tin sources

The metallurgical chain (Harding 2000: 206–20; Hauptmann 2007: 7-8) begins with finding the ore. Our initial exploration for possible sources of tin ore involved sampling of sands and gravels from sand bars, banks and stream bottoms along tributaries to the Jadar flowing south from Mount Cer (Figure 2). Sediment samples were washed, sieved and panned in situ, and sample locations were recorded using GPS. Sand and gravel fractions were tested for elemental constituents using a hand-held Innov-X X-ray fluorescence (XRF) apparatus with a detection limit for tin of 50–150 ppm. Over 130 samples were processed in this manner. Analysis of tin-bearing sands from the Milinska Reka by Scanning Electron Microscope [SEM] with Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy [EDS] indicates that several chemically and visually distinct forms of cassiterite are present. Additional indicator minerals of pegmatite-hosted tin mineralisation, such as columbite ([Fe,Mn][Nb,Ta]2O6), also occur in sands of the Milinska Reka.


Figure 2
Figure 2. Tin sampling: concentrations around Spasovine.
Click to enlarge.
Figure 3
Figure 3. SEM analysis of cassiterite from tributaries of the river Jadar.
Click to enlarge.

Tin was not easy to detect in most sediments sampled in 2010. Only three samples yielded statistically significant Sn concentrations, while many samples yielded low concentrations (10–30 ppm) that were below the manufacturer's stated 50–150ppm detection limit for the Innov XRF. Three of these sub-detection limit samples were further processed using heavy liquid (sodium polytungstate, density 2.89 g/cm3) separation techniques. The resulting heavy mineral concentrate from two of these yielded statistically valid Sn anomalies, (24.398±751 ppm and 126±16 ppm), and the presence of detrital cassiterite was confirmed in both samples through SEM analysis [Figure 3].

Prospect

The Jadar Project is designed to look at one part of the far-flung Bronze Age trade network (Sherratt 2004), to document the process of tin production and to examine the effects of this production and dissemination on small communities. Our preliminary results are encouraging and future work will focus on further locating metal sources and archaeological sites and on documenting the environmental properties of these locales.

Acknowledgments

Funding for the Jadar Project pilot season was provided by a grant from the PSC-CUNY Research Awards Program. We would like to thank Vesna Ćirić (Monuments Preservation Commission, Valjevo), Živan Grujičić (Museum of Osečina), and Serbian and American graduates and undergraduates who participated in the project.

References

  • DURMAN, A. 1997. Tin in Southeastern Europe? Opuscula Archaeologica 21: 7–14.
  • HARDING, A. 2000. European societies in the Bronze Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • HAUPTMANN, A. 2007. The archaeometallurgy of copper: evidence from Faynan, Jordan. Berlin: Springer.
  • HAUSTEIN, M., C. GILLIS & E. PERNICKA. 2010. Tin isotopy — a new method for solving old questions. Archaeometry 52: 816–32.
  • MCGEEHAN-LIRITZIS, V. & J.W. TAYLOR. 1987 Yugoslavian tin deposits and the Early Bronze Age industries of the Aegean period. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 6: 287–300.
  • PENHALLURICK, R. 1986. Tin in Antiquity. London: Institute of Metals.
  • RAPP, G. 1999. Copper, tin, and arsenic sources in the Aegean Bronze Age, in P. Betancourt, V. Karageoghis, R. Laffineur & W. Niemeier (ed.) Melemata: Studies in Aegean archaeology presented to Malcolm H. Wiener as he enters his 65th year, vol. 3: 699–704. Liège: University of Liège.
  • SKARPELIS, N. 2003. Ancient potential tin sources in the Aegean, in A. Giumlia-Mair & F. Schiavo (ed.) The problem of early tin (BAR International Series 1199): 59–65. Oxford: Archaeopress.
  • SHERRATT, A. 2004. Material resources, capital, and power: the coevolution of society and culture, in G. Feinman & L. Nicholas (ed.) Archaeological perspectives on political economies: 79–103. Salt Lake City (UT): University of Utah Press.
  • VALERA, R. & P. VALERA. 2003. Tin in the Mediterranean area: history and geology, in A. Giumlia-Mair & F. Schiavo (ed.) The problem of early tin (BAR International Series 1199): 3–14. Oxford: Archaeopress.
  • ZOTOVIĆ, M. 1985. Arheološki i etnički problemi bronzanog i gvozdenog doba zapadne Srbije. Titovo Užice, Beograd: Zavicajni muzej i SADJ.

Author

* Author for correspondence

  • H. Arthur Bankoff*
    Anthropology & Archaeology, Brooklyn College, City University of New York, 2900 Bedford Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11210, USA. (Email: abankoff@brooklyn.cuny.edu)
  • Slobodan Mitrović
    Brooklyn College, City University of New York, Brooklyn NY, USA
  • Radivoje Arsić
    Cultural Heritage Preservation Institute of Valjevo, Serbia
  • Rebecca Boger
    Brooklyn College, City University of New York, Brooklyn NY, USA
  • Vojislav Filipović
    University of Belgrade, Serbia
  • Andrea Huska
    Brooklyn College, City University of New York, Brooklyn NY, USA
  • Wayne Powell
    Brooklyn College, City University of New York, Brooklyn NY, USA