Harvesting cereals with bronze sickles in Bronze Age Southern France

Laurent Bouby
Figure 1Figure 1. Late Bronze Age bronze sickles from the Bourget lake and especially from the site of Grésine (Savoie, France) (b,c and d) (after Kerouanton 2002).
Click to enlarge.

It is always difficult to identify the tools used for harvesting in prehistoric times. Different kinds of implements and practices can occur, from the use of the hands to wooden, lithic or metallic tools (Sigaut 1991). Harvesting by hand or even with wooden objects can hardly be known from prehistoric settlements. On the other hand, the cutting stone or metallic tools, usually regarded as sickles or sickle elements from their morphology alone, are not necessarily linked to the harvest. They may have been used to cut any kind of plant material (crops, forage, branch wood, plants for roofing, etc.). Specifically it has been suggested that, despite appearances, bronze sickles were not used for harvesting cereals. It can be argued firstly that we do not know any ethnographic harvest cutting tool that is not made of iron or stone, and secondly that the use of the sickle is linked to an agricultural technical system which involves the collection and transportation of straw and only appears later. (Sigaut 1988a; 1988b). Bronze sickles could have been better employed to collect fodder (most probably leaf or twig foddering) for working animals, especially horses. In the late Bronze Age (Bronze final IIIb) lakeshore site of Grésine (Bourget lake, Savoie, France), the presence together of bronze sickles and of botanical remains of crops and weeds (Bouby & Billaud 2001) reopens the discussion of the use of sickles for harvesting grain.

Figure 2Figure 2. Reaping level of the winter cereals in Southern France Bronze Age settlements as inferred from the maximal growing height of the weeds. The lowest weed harvested with the crop indicates the height under which the cutting of straw has been done. Romagnat, Puy-de-Dôme, early Bronze Age (BA) (Bouby 2002); Les Cazals, Aude, middle Bronze Age (BM) (Van Zeist et al. 1983); BPNL (Boulevard Périphérique Nord de Lyon, Rhône, late Bronze Age (BF I) (Jacquet et al. 1998); Balme Gontran, Ain, late Bronze Age (BF IIb-IIIa) (Bouby unpublished); Baume Layrou, Gard, late Bronze Age (BF II) (Bouby unpublished); La Fangade, Hérault, late Bronze Age (BF II) (Bouby et al. 1999); Grésine, Savoie, late Bronze Age (BF IIIb) (Bouby & Billaud 2001); Chindrieux, Savoie, late Bronze Age (BF IIb) (Jacquot 1994).
Click to enlarge.

The height of cutting can be inferred from the maximal growing height of the weeds unintentionally collected with the crop. In Grésine, many of the typical weeds of winter cereals do not grow higher than 30 or 40 cm (e.g. Aphanes arvensis, Chaenorrhinum minus, Papaver argemone, Scleranthus annuus, Stachys annua or Viola cf. tricolor), indicating that the straw was cut lower than this. Such a low reaping level necessarily implies the use of a sharp tool. Bronze sickles have been discovered in the settlement of Grésine and in other neighbouring sites of the Bourget lake (Figure 1; Kerouanton 2002). It is all the more probable that these sickles were used to cut cereals as the lithic tools, likely to be used for this purpose, become extremely rare at that time in the area. In Switzerland, the early and middle Bronze Age denticulate flint blades which could represent sickle pieces disappeared during the late Bronze Age (Hochuli & Maise 1998). Moreover, the production of bronze sickles cannot be explained by the beginning of foddering because the collection of leaf and twig forage for livestock was already well established in the Alpine area during Neolithic times (Rasmussen 1993; Akeret et al. 1999). The use of sickles to harvest cereals is connected with a quite low reaping level and with the need to collect straw (Sigaut 1988a; Alonso I Martinez 1999).

A question however remains. Was all the harvest collected in only one operation or was there first of all a high gathering of the ears of grain and then, in a second operation, a low cut of the straw? This question can be answered by the study of storage assemblages where the associated grain and weeds have necessarily been collected together. Two late Bronze Age storage context from Southern France, Baume Layrou and Balme Gontran (Figure 2) contained both cereals and low growing weeds; therefore the harvest was made in a single operation.

In Figure 2, the three assemblages from early to late Bronze Age I point to a high reaping level while in all the sites from late Bronze Age II onwards low cutting is documented. The hypothesis needs to be consolidated by new analysis but a change from high to low reaping seem to have occurred around the beginnings of the late Bronze Age. This is roughly coincident with the arrival of bronze sickles, which appear in France during middle Bronze Age (Guilaine 1991). Even if bronze sickles were never very common in Southern France and if low cutting of cereals is already evidenced in some Neolithic sites (e.g. Jacomet et al. 1989), one may consider that some kind of relation probably existed between the adoption of bronze sickles on the one hand and the development of low reaping and of straw harvesting on the other hand.

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Yves Billaud (DRASSM) for providing the beautiful samples from Grésine and information about harvesting tools in Switzerland. I am also grateful to Gérard Roussel for his comments on the English text.

References

  • AKERET, Ö, J. N. HAAS, U. LEUZINGER & S. JACOMET, 1999. Plant macrofossils and pollen in goat/sheep faeces from the Neolithic lake-shore settlement Arbon Bleiche 3, Switzerland, The Holocene 9, 2: 175-182.
  • ALONSO I MARTINEZ, N. 1999. De la llavor a la farina. Els processos agrícoles protohistòrics a la Catalunya occidental. Lattes : Monographies d’Archéologie Méditerranéenne 4.
  • BOUBY, L. 2000. Agriculture et cueillette à l’âge du Bronze ancien dans la Vallée du Rhône et en basse Auvergne, in M. Leduc, N. Valdeyron & J. Vaquer (eds.), Sociétés et espaces : 201-210. Toulouse, Archives d’Ecologie Préhistorique.
  • BOUBY, L., F. LEROY & L. CAROZZA, 1999. Food plants from late Bronze Age lagoon sites in Languedoc, southern France: reconstruction of farming economy and environment, Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 8: 53-69.
  • BOUBY, L. & Y. BILLAUD, 2001. Economie agraire à la fin de l’âge du Bronze sur les bords du lac du Bourget (Savoie, France), Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris, Sciences de la Terre et des planètes 333 : 749-756.
  • GUILAINE, J. 1991. Vers une préhistoire agraire, in J. Guilaine (ed.), Pour une archéologie agraire: 31-80. Paris : Armand Colin.
  • HOCHULI, S. & C. MAISE, 1998. Outils et objets de parure en pierre, in S. Hochuli, U. Niffeler & V. Rychner (eds), Age du Bronze, La Suisse du Paléolithique au Moyen Age III : 269-273. Bâle : Schweizerische Geselleschaft für Ur- und Frühgeschichte.
  • JACOMET, S., C. BROMBACHER & M. DICK, 1989. Archäobotanik am Zürichsee. Zürich: Zürcher Denkmalpflege.
  • JACQUET, P., L. BOUBY, O. FRANC, P. BERTRAN, L. FABRE & J. ARGANT, 1998. Paléoenvironnement, économie et peuplement, in P. Jacquet (ed.), Habitats de l’âge du Bronze à Lyon-Vaise (Rhône) : 213-238. Paris : Documents d’Archéologie Française 68.
  • JACQUOT, K. 1994. Paléoécologie et paléoéconomie d’un site de l’âge du Bronze : étude des paléosemences de Chindrieux, Châtillon (Lac du Bourget). Besançon : Mémoire de DEA, Université de Franche Comté.
  • KEROUANTON, I. 2002. Le lac du Bourget (Savoie) à l’Âge du Bronze final : les groupes culturels et la question du groupe du Bourget, Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 99, 3 : 521-561.
  • RASMUSSEN, P. 1993. Analysis of Goat/Sheep Faeces from Egolzwil 3, Switzerland: Evidence for Branch and Twig Foddering of Livestock in the Neolithic, Journal of Archaeological Science 20: 479-502.
  • SIGAUT, F. 1988a. L’évolution technique des agricultures européennes avant l’époque industrielle, Revue Archéologique du Centre de la France 27,1 : 8-41.
  • SIGAUT, F. 1988b. A method for identifying grain storage techniques and its application for European agricultural history, Tools and Tillage 6, 1: 3-32.
  • SIGAUT, F. 1991. Les techniques de récolte des grains. Identification, localisation, problèmes d’interprétation, in M.-C. Cauvin (ed), Rites et rythmes agraires: 31-43. Lyon: Travaux de la Maison de l’Orient, 20.
  • VAN ZEIST, W., J. GUILAINE & J. GASCO, 1983. L’orge du Bronze Moyen de la grotte des Cazals (Sallèles-Cabardès, Aude), Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 80, 4: 117-118.

Authors

Note: Author information correct at time of publication

  • Laurent Bouby
    CEPAM - CNRS, UMR 6130, Sophia-Antipolis, 06560 Valbonne, France (Email: bouby@cepam.cnrs.fr)