Hominids and palaeoenvironments in the Moravian Karst during Marine Isotope Stage 3: new excavations in Pod Hradem Cave, Czech Republic

Ladislav Nejman, Duncan Wright, Lenka Lisá, Nela Doláková, Ivan Horáček, Jan Novák, Rachel Wood, Martina Pacher, Sandra Sázelová, Martin Holub, Antonín Přichystal, Miriam Nývltová Fišáková & Aleš Bajer

Introduction

Figure 1
Figure 1. Location of Pod Hradem Cave.
Click to enlarge.

Frequent, high-amplitude changes in temperature are well-documented in marine sediment and glacier cores during Marine Isotope Stage 3, however there is little information about their potentially substantial effects on environments in Central Europe. These rapid climatic and corresponding environmental changes may have had an impact on human populations in the region. This short article introduces palaeoenvironmental and archaeological results from a recent excavation at Pod Hradem Cave in Czech Republic.

Project overview

Pod Hradem cave is situated in the Moravian Karst region of southern Moravia, approximately 21km north of Brno and 4km from the well-known cave site, Kůlna (Figure 1). Pod Hradem Cave underwent limited investigations in 1890, 1896, 1897 and 1898 (Trampler 1898; Knies 1901) followed by a major excavation in 1956–58 (Musil 1965). New dates have been obtained by Neruda & Nerudová (2013) from samples from the 1950s excavations. Work to date at Pod Hradem has provided insights into cave bear and (limited) human activity during Middle and Upper Palaeolithic periods. In particular, Valoch (1965) suggested the presence of a 'Pod Hradem Interstadial' represented in the stratigraphic profile and dating to the Upper Palaeolithic.

In 2011 and 2012, a 3 x 1m trench (divided into Squares A, B and C) was excavated near the entrance of Pod Hradem Cave (Figures 2 & 3). Fine-grained excavation and sampling methods were used to expedite maximum retention of evidence (cf. Wright et al. in prep.). Pollen, charcoal, stable isotopes, microfauna, large fauna, micromorphology, and sedimentological and geochemical analyses have been used to reconstruct palaeoenvironment, palaeoclimate and site formation, whilst stone and bone artefacts and manuports provide information about cultural activities.


Figure 2
Figure 2. Entrance to Pod Hradem Cave.
Click to enlarge.
Figure 3
Figure 3. The excavation pit at the end of the 2012 field season.
Click to enlarge.

Preliminary results

Figure 4
Figure 4. Part of a cave bear skull discovered at the base of the excavation.
Click to enlarge.

Twelve AMS dates indicate that the currently exposed profile (layers 3–12) dates to between ~27 ka to ~50 ka cal BP, spanning the Middle–Upper Palaeolithic transition. A micromorphology study indicates that sediments can be generally classified as unsorted silt loams, with stratigraphic units subdivided into multiple cold and relatively warmer, more humid events. Geoarchaeological interpretations suggest most sediments entered the cave by gravity (creep or sheetwash) from the sedimentary cone at the cave entrance.

During Marine Isotope Stage 3, areas of rocky debris in the immediate vicinity were dominated by grassland and herb species, while pockets of trees and marshy or riparian habitats could be found in the wider surroundings. An increase in fern spores, arboreal palynomorphs and charcoal, and the presence of the bat Plecotus auritus in Layer 3 is consistent with classification of this layer as a warmer period.

More than 14 500 bone and tooth specimens were collected from squares A and C (excluding the wet-sieved fraction). Most are highly fragmented with only 11 per cent identifiable to taxon. Cave bear (Ursus spelaeus) dominated the assemblage, and is present in every Pleistocene layer (3–12; Figure 4). Other species include reindeer, red deer, wolf, aurochs/bison, horse, badger, hare, fox, mustelids and a mid-sized bird. The high proportion of cave bear bones, the majority of which belong to juveniles and neonates, suggests the cave was used as a bear hibernation and parturition den (see also Gargett 1996).

Figure 5
Figure 5. A leafpoint discovered in a layer dated to approximately 40 000 years BP.
Click to enlarge.

Direct evidence for human activity at Pod Hradem was restricted to small quantities of stone and bone artefacts, manuports, charcoal interpreted as a dispersed hearth, and burnt bone (cf. Nejman et al. in prep.). Most lithics were exotic, sourced to multiple locations in several directions within a 200km radius of the site (Figure 5). Some of the cultural materials have been recovered from layers 6 and 10, which seem to represent 'warmer' periods based on geoarchaeological evidence. Layer 10 contained a large amount of charcoal, burnt bone, manuports and a small number of lithics. Layer 6 contained a decorated tubular bone rod (Wright et al. in prep.; Figure 6) and a porcelanite flake. The latter is comparable to artefacts excavated at Pod Hradem in the 1950s which were sourced to Kunětická hora in Eastern Bohemia (northern Czech Republic) (Nerudová et al. 2012).

Discussion

Research at Pod Hradem confirms long-term cave bear activity, with infrequent visits by small groups of humans. Pollen, charcoal and faunal evidence consistently suggest a glacial, mosaic landscape with a range of habitats and biomes within a short distance of the cave.

Figure 6
Figure 6. Tubular bone rod discovered during the 2011 field season.
Click to enlarge.

We have not found evidence for the 'Pod Hradem Interstadial' event as defined by Musil and Valoch (1966). It was originally defined on the basis of clearly stratified, brown, humic soil sediment and accepted in the international literature (e.g. Smith 1982; Churchill & Smith 2000). Over time, however, these two authors modified their definition of this event and inconsistencies have begun to appear (see e.g. Musil 2001; Valoch 2012). Current research in Pod Hradem has not confirmed the presence of this sedimentary unit, and this division is now considered redundant (Nerudová et al. in prep).

A dispersed hearth, burnt bone, and other cultural remains in the securely dated Layer 10 have implications for hominid occupation of the Moravian Karst during the late Middle/Early Upper Palaeolithic period and can potentially add to debate concerning the coexistence of Neanderthals and anatomically modern humans in this part of Europe. Although evidence remains circumstantial, several different threads support this hypothesis. These include raw material similarities between artefacts from Pod Hradem and the Neanderthal occupation of nearby Kůlna Cave, the apparent absence of early anatomically modern humans in the Moravian Karst (Svoboda 2009: 81), and overlapping radiocarbon ages between Pod Hradem Layer 10 and Neanderthal sites in this region. This question will be explored in future publications.

The discovery of a decorated tubular bone rod (unprecedented in Central Europe but strikingly similar to those known from Western and Eastern Europe; Figure 6) and multiple exotic lithics suggest wide-ranging movements of modern humans throughout much of the site's history. Complex socio-political inter-relationships are expected to have existed between resident and visiting communities, negotiated through differential site selection and importation of portable art objects (Nejman et al. in prep; Wright et al. in prep.).

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Professor Jiří Svoboda for his support and guidance in this project. We would also like to thank the staff of CHKO, especially RNDr. Antonín Tůma and RNDr. Leoš Štefka for their generosity and support of this project. Special thanks to Mr David Sojka for technical support during fieldwork, Mgr. Vlasta Dadejová for professional photography and Assoc. Prof. Miroslav Králík for a photograph of the bone rod. Many thanks to all the people who participated in this research, in particular all the collaborators and excavation volunteers. This project was funded from the SoMoPro program. Research leading to these results has received a financial contribution from the European Community within the Seventh Framework Program (FP/2007-2013) under Grant Agreement No. 229603. The research was also co-financed by the South Moravian Region and the Department of Anthropology, Masaryk University.

References

  • CHURCHILL, S.E. & F.H. SMITH. 2000. Makers of the early Aurignacian of Europe. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 43: 61–115.
  • GARGETT, R.H. 1996. Cave bears and modern human origins: the spatial taphonomy of Pod Hradem Cave, Czech Republic. Lanham (MD): University Press of America.
  • KNIES, J. 1901. Čtvrtohorní zvířena jeskyně Pod hradem u Suchdola na Moravě. Časopis vlastivědného musejního spolku v Olomouci 18: 5–12 & 50–56.
  • MUSIL, R. 1965. Die Bährenhöhle Pod hradem. Die Entwicklung der Höhlenbären im letzten Glazial, in J. Jelinek (ed.) Die Erforschung der Höhle Pod hradem 1956–1958 (Anthropos 18 (NS 10)): 7–92. Brno: Moravské Museum v Brně.
    – 2001. Interpretační nesrovnalosti ve stratigrafii posledního glaciálu. Geologické výzkumy na Moravě a ve Slezsku v roce 2000 8: 10–14.
  • MUSIL, R. & K. VALOCH. 1966. Beitrag zur Gliederung des Würms im Mitteleuropa. Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart 17: 131–38.
  • NEJMAN, L., N. DOLÁKOVÁ, L. LISÁ, I. HORÁČEK, J. NOVÁK, M. PACHER, S. SÁZELOVÁ, M. HOLUB, R. WOOD, D. WRIGHT, A. PŘICHYSTAL, N. NERUDA, Z. NERUDOVÁ, M. NÝVLTOVÁ-FIŠÁKOVÁ & A. BAJER. In preparation. Multidisciplinary approach to reconstructing the chronology and palaeoenvironment of the Moravian Karst, Central Europe, during MIS 3: the contribution of Pod Hradem Cave.
  • NERUDA, P. & Z. NERUDOVÁ. 2013. The Middle-Upper Palaeolithic transition in Moravia in the context of the Middle Danube region. Quaternary International 294: 3–19.
  • NERUDOVÁ, Z., A. PŘICHYSTAL & P. NERUDA. 2012. Revize nálezů z jeskyně Pod hradem v Moravském krasu. Archeologické rozhledy LXIV: 136–52.
  • NERUDOVÁ, Z., P. NERUDA, L. NEJMAN & L. LISÁ. In preparation. Critical review of Pod Hradem Interstadial.
  • SMITH, F.H. 1982. Upper Pleistocene hominid evolution in south-central Europe: a review of the evidence and analysis of trends. Current Anthropology 23: 667–703.
  • SVOBODA, J. 2009. Čas lovců. Aktualizované dějiny paleolitu. Brno: CERM.
  • TRAMPLER, R. 1898. Die Burghöhle im Punkwathale in Mähren. Deutsche Rundschau für Geographie und Statistik 20(12): 529–38.
  • VALOCH, K. 1965. Die altsteinzeitlichen Begehungen der Höhle Pod Hradem, in J. Jelinek (ed.) Die Erforschung der Höhle Pod hradem 1956–1958 (Anthropos 18 (NS 10)): 93–106. Brno: Moravské Museum v Brně.
    – 2012. K historii členění würmského/viselského glaciálu v českých zemích. Archeologické rozhledy LXIV: 129–35.
  • WRIGHT, D., L. NEJMAN, F. D'ERRICO, M. KRÁLÍK, M. IVANOV & Š. HLADILOVÁ. In preparation. Early Upper Palaeolithic decorated bone tubular rod from Pod Hradem Cave, Czech Republic.

Authors

Note: Author information correct at time of publication

  • Ladislav Nejman
    Department of Anthropology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, Brno, 611 37, Czech Republic & School of Social Science, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
  • Duncan Wright
    School of Humanities, Griffith University, Gold Coast campus, Parklands Drive, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia
  • Lenka Lisá
    Institute of Geology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Rozvojová 269, Prague 6, 165 00, Czech Republic
  • Nela Doláková
    Department of Geological Sciences, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, Brno, 611 37, Czech Republic
  • Ivan Horáček
    Department of Zoology, Charles University, Viničná 7, Prague 2, 128 00, Czech Republic
  • Jan Novák
    Department of Botany, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, České Budějovice, 370 05, Czech Republic
  • Rachel Wood
    Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Jaeger Building 4, Building 61, 1 Mills Road, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
  • Martina Pacher
    Institute of Palaeontology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, UZA II, Vienna, Austria
  • Sandra Sázelová & Martin Holub
    Department of Anthropology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, Brno, 611 37, Czech Republic
  • Antonín Přichystal
    Department of Geological Sciences, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, Brno, 611 37, Czech Republic
  • Miriam Nývltová Fišáková
    Department of Palaeolithic and Palaeoethnology, Institute of Archaeology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Královopolská 147, Brno, 612 00, Czech Republic
  • Aleš Bajer
    Department of Geology and Pedology, Mendel University, Zemědělská 3, Brno, 613 00, Czech Republic